Reviewed by: Curtis D. Smith
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Average |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | Teen to Adult |
Genre: | Sci-Fi Action Mystery |
Length: | 2 hr. 3 min. |
Year of Release: | 2000 |
USA Release: |
November 17, 2000 |
Featuring |
Arnold Schwarzenegger … Adam Gibson Robert Duvall … Dr. Griffin Weir Michael Rapaport … Hank Morgan Tony Goldwyn … Michael Drucker Terry Crews … Vincent Michael Rooker … Robert Marshall Sarah Wynter … Talia Elsworth Wendy Crewson … Natalie Gibson Rodney Rowland (Rod Rowland) … P. Wiley Ken Pogue … Speaker Day Colin Cunningham … Tripp See all » |
Director |
Roger Spottiswoode |
Producer |
Phoenix Pictures Daniel Petrie Jr., David Coatsworth, Mike Medavoy, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jon Davison |
Distributor |
Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures |
“The 6th Day” won’t necessarily be the final nail hammered into the action film coffin, but it sure doesn’t do much to bolster the floundering genre.
Another dubious genre is Science fiction, which also plays a large role in “The 6th Day”. While the film shows hints of the brilliance that makes for good sci-fi fun, too much of the film’s success or failure lies on the large shoulders of its star rather than on a quality story. But once you see the story you’ll know why.
The one thing that could save “The 6th Day” at the box office is its tribute to some of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s past efforts, namely the immoral yet successfully engaging “Total Recall”. And though his latest is a far cry better than his last junker, “End of Days”, it still falls flat in just about every way. Except for in its defense of God’s sovereignty as it relates to the creation of man. In the future, “sooner than you think,” the president is a woman (hopefully not Hillary) helicopters convert mid-air into jet airplanes, single guys have beautiful virtual girlfriends and RePet facilities can clone Fido if he dies unexpectedly. It is in this setting that devoted family man and helicopter charter pilot Adam Gibson (Schwarzenegger), along with associate Hank (Michael Rapaport), enjoys a successful business shuttling thrill seekers to and from the mountains for snowboarding trips. Things are going great for the Gibsons until a rich and famous animal cloning entrepreneur named Druker (Tony Goldwyn) charters a flight. Feigning a security check, Drucker’s malevolent gang captures some of the guys’ DNA in order to clone them for reasons unknown to this reviewer. Evidently, any knowledge of Drucker’s devious business practices are enough to warrant elimination by clonig, but the ambiguity surrounding the bad guys’ motives is vast.
In any event, Adam is duplicated and later returns home to find he is now out of the family loop. Before he can march into his own house and demand an explanation he is accosted by a thug named Marshall (Michael Rooker) and a thugette named Talia (Sarah Wynter). As should be expected a huge car chase and firefight ensues which eventually reduces Talia and another ruffian to road kill. Not to worry though, Drucker orders his chief scientist, Dr. Griffin Weir (Robert Duvall), to simply clone the two loyal employees—after which he complains about it costing him $1.2 million to do so—and race is back on to eliminate Adam once and for all before the company’s illegal practices are revealed to the public.
The first question that comes to mind (other than why Drucker can’t just hire different thugs for less than $1.2 million) is why the bad guys go through all the trouble to clone some average Joe rather than just conceal their crimes the old fashioned way?
Indeed the film raises more questions than it answers and things get even more sticky when the morality of cloning is explored from all sides. Is it OK to clone a dying species of salmon they ask? How about your dying sister or what about farming body parts for organ and limb transplants?
While Scripture does not delve into specifics on the topic it is clear that God’s handiwork should not and cannot be duplicated or tampered with when it comes to humanity. Likewise, the idea of eternal life, as sought by the story’s bad guys, cannot be attained outside of faith in Christ and His untainted forgiveness. Hebrews 9:27 says, “And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment” and John 3:16 is very clear on the eternal life issue. However, in “The 6th Day” several jokes are made about how many times one of the inept thugs has to be brought back to life through cloning.
Auspiciously, the good guys take God’s side in “The 6th Day” (a reference to the Creation story) and identify the practice of human cloning as an abomination. Furthermore, clear lines of right and wrong are drawn and those on the righteous side of the issue do not sacrifice their integrity to win.
To the surprise of many, Schwarzenegger has made several public statements lately admonishing violence in film. While he himself is responsible for most of the action movie violence that has been so prolific on and off for the past decade, he says turning 50 and raising a family has mellowed his view of the standard action film and violence. So as featured in this rare PG-13 action flick, look forward to more kindler, gentler Schwarzenegger films to come.
It’s just too bad the entertainment portion of “The 6th Day” suffers so badly. Once the ambiguous foundation of the story is in place we settle into a fairly straightforward action film that pits our muscle-bound hero against the cloning baddies. But it isn’t long before the plot throws another curveball by generating some confusion as to which Adam is the real Adam. This uncertainty mixed with the fast pace of the film offers little opportunity for the viewers to catch up to the story—a story which is never really distinct in the first place.
Being the first big budget film to take a good look at the cloning issue (unless you count “Multiplicity”), “The 6th day” squanders a great opportunity to match a real life issue with a compelling story. Sure, sci-fi films are often laced with hazy tangents and baffling rationale, but enough post-credits thought dedicated to the subject can usually produce a resolution. Not so with “The 6th Day”. One must wonder why instead of cloning average Joes and hit men the bad guys don’t just clone enough members of Congress to sway the moral vote in their favor? Still others might simply ask why Hollywood doesn’t just spend more time making movies with sensible, alluring and morally virtuous plots. Now that has to be one of life’s biggest unanswered questions isn’t it?