Copyright, Paramount Pictures Corporation, a subsidiary of ViacomCBS
Today’s Prayer Focus
MOVIE REVIEW

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

also known as “Star Trek the Voyage Home,” “Star Trek IV: Cesta domů,” “Jornada nas Estrelas IV: A Volta para Casa,” “Misión: Salvar la Tierra,” “Powrót na Ziemię,” “Resan hem,” “Rotta verso la Terra,” “Star Trek - A hazatérés,” See more »

Reviewed by: Ian Hosier
CONTRIBUTOR

Moral Rating: Average
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Adults Teens
Genre: Sci-Fi Adventure Comedy
Length: 1 hr. 52 min.
Year of Release: 1986
USA Release: November 26, 1986
Poster art for “Star Trek IV”
Relevant Issues

EARTH’S ENVIRONMENT—Should Christians be concerned about the environment? Answer

What is man’s responsibility to the environment? Answer

click for answerHow is it possible for reasonable, intelligent, well-educated people to hold such diametrically opposite views as Evolutionism and Creationism? Answer

Creation SuperLibrary.com
Evidence against Evolutionism and for the Creator. Our SuperLibrary is provided by a top team of experts from various respected scientific creationist organizations who answer your questions on a wide variety of topics.

Extraterrestrial intelligent life

What does the Bible say about intelligent life on other planets?

Are we alone in the universe?

Does Scripture refer to life in space?

Questions and answers about the origin of LIFE

Featuring William Shatner
Leonard Nimoy
DeForrest Kelley
George Takai
James Doohan
Walter Koenig
Director Leonard Nimoy
Producer Ralph Winter
Harve Bennett
See all »
Distributor
Distributor: Paramount Pictures Corporation. Trademark logo.
Paramount Pictures Corporation
, a subsidiary of ViacomCBS

It’s the 23rd century and a mysterious Alien probe is threatening Earth. In a frantic attempt to save the planet, Kirk and crew must time travel back to 1986 in an attempt to retrieve a pair of hump back whales; to a world of punks. pizza and exact change buses as alien as anything they have encountered in space before!

This film is a generally good humoured (the only Star Trek movie that made me laugh—a lot!). It will be enjoyable for many teens and adults. Occasional bad language and a complex storyline would make this movie unsuitable for children.

BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVE: This film indirectly preaches false evolutionary ideas including the memorable comment “whales have taken 10 million years to evolve” and also that man (Kirk and his crew) are capable of saving the planet—a task which only God is qualified to do. However, the film also conveys a very positive message concerning the need for conservation of God’s creation (and the possible consequences of not doing so), although of course God is the judge and not some alien race.

ILLEGAL BEHAVIOUR: This film is generally very moral and decent, however there are a few profanities including two instances of taking the Lord’s name in vain. There are no scenes of sex or violence in this movie.

RECOMMENDATIONS: Watch and enjoy, but make sure your Christian worldview is intact before you do!


Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Positive
Positive—This is probably the most accessible of the Star Trek movies (save, maybe, First Contact). It’s much more funny than the others, and has the ability to laugh at the Star Trek universe. The Trekkers go back to 20th century California to gets a few whales to save their world. Here, it does take something of an environmentalist turn, and we DO have to sit through a bit of near-preaching by a tour guide (played by the same woman who now played Annie Camden on 7th Heaven). She falls for Kirk, but wants to see that the dolphins are safe.

Much of the movie is about these characters in the 20th century… Bones lamenting the primitive medical conditions, Scotty talking to a man’s Macintosh, expecting it to reply, and everyone getting used to the rudeness this is 20th Century California. Some of the more memorable, yet possibly offensive, running gags in this movie is Spock’s attempt to fit in to the culture by mildly swearing in every other line. The main reason I find this funny is that it shows to us the stupidity and the needlessness of profanity.
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 4]
David Poe, age 24
Positive—“The Voyage Home” is the first Star Trek film I recall seeing in a movie theater. Its message of preserving the environment remains just as vital now as in when this film was released in 1986. A perfect mixture of humor and seriousness. This film is the final part of what Star Trek fans call the “Genesis Trilogy” starting with “The Wrath of Khan” followed by “The Search for Spock” and ending with this film. The Voyage Home gives the important message that all life on Earth has a right to exist, not just humans.

The film began with a brief but moving tribute to the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. Catherine Hicks played the part of Dr. Gillian Taylor with heart, passion, and emotion. While Robert Ellenstein was very dignified as Federation President Hiram Roth (some sources list the Federation President’s name as Alistair Fergus).

A fun and educational science fiction classic the time travel shenanigans in this film had a very positive impact on the Star Trek Universe and is referenced to years later. For Example, the punk on the San Francisco bus in this film was later encountered by Seven of Nine and Raffaela Musiker in Los Angeles in 2024, while he was once again playing music loudly on a bus, he was much more agreeable when asked to turn it down, as seen in the Star Trek: Picard episode “Watcher.” William Shatner himself spoke about the greatness of “The Voyage Home” when he hosted Saturday Night Live on December 20, 1986, in the opening monologue, even the end credits to this film was uniquely and superbly done. All people who care about Climate Change should watch this film!
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 4
Jeff Andrew Winters, age 44 (USA)
Neutral
Neutral—Good message about treating the environment and God’s creatures correctly as to avoid disaster. The familiar “Star Trek” characters looked a little too comfortable moving around in the 20th century, however. I understood that they would have knowledge of history, but the time travel plot didn’t go over well. Mainly for fans of the series.
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 2½]
Hillari Hunter, age 40