Reviewed by: Pamela Karpelenia
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Average |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | Adults Teens |
Genre: | Horror Thriller Drama Sequel |
Length: | 1 hr. 38 min. |
Year of Release: | 2015 |
USA Release: |
January 2, 2015 (wide—2,602 theaters) DVD: April 14, 2014 |
World War 2
ghost stories
haunted houses
MALEVOLENT SPIRITS—Where do these dangerous, hostile, and evil entities come from? Answer (Who are they? Why do they exist? An open letter to Wiccan and Spiritist believers from a former Spiritist)
ghosts and the Bible
FEAR, Anxiety and Worry—What does the Bible say? Answer
Featuring |
Helen McCrory … Jean Hogg Jeremy Irvine … Harry Burnstow Phoebe Fox … Eve Parkins Oaklee Pendergast … Edward Ned Dennehy … Old Hermit Jacob Leanne Best … Woman In Black Leilah de Meza … Ruby Hayley Joanne Bacon … Woman at Station Adrian Rawlins … Dr. Rhodes Jorge Leon Martinez … Londoner Amelia Pidgeon … Joyce Claire Rafferty … Clara See all » |
Director |
Tom Harper |
Producer |
Alliance Films Hammer Films See all » |
Distributor |
Relativity Media, owned by UltraV Holdings |
Prequel: “The Woman in Black” (2012)
This film is a sequel to “The Woman in Black” and takes place 40 years later in 1941 during the Germany bombings of London. As a way to seek refuge from the disaster occurring in their homeland. Two teachers take a group of children, including one young child who was recently orphaned, to a dark, dilapidated mansion—the one where the original film took place.
Edward, the recently orphaned child, has stopped speaking since the loss of his parents and starts to see things around the mansion, including the elusive woman in black, and, after seeing her, other children begin to disappear and are found dead. That’s the setup for this sequel.
I did not enjoy the film. I found it unnecessary and dull. The acting is weak, with poorly developed characters, with cliché music and false jump scares with no meaning. The cinematography is dark… literally; I couldn’t see much of anything, at times, which quickly became annoying. The plot that was so strong in its predecessor was stumped—no development, the audience learns nothing more, contrary to what is expected in a sequel. The lead actress character “Eve,” has a secret in her past which isn’t enough to hold my attention or carry the film.
As for objectionable content, there is not too much, but I should mention that there is profanity (e.g., OMG). Not to mention the ideas of a ghost and haunting which are more prominent in this fallen world. Which leads me to biblical issues.
ghosts and the Bible
MALEVOLENT SPIRITS—Where do these dangerous, hostile, and evil entities come from? Answer (Who are they? Why do they exist? An open letter to Wiccan and Spiritist believers from a former Spiritist)
There isn’t much in this film, however, something did ring true, it pertains to dealing with the past. When we are saved by Jesus Christ, he removes our sins, as far as the east is from the west. I know personally; I kept having the sins of my past keep me from truly living in God’s grace, and sometimes it is a struggle. We, as Christians, must realize that if God, the Creator of all can forgive his fallen creation, through His One and Only Son, we need to live in His Grace and tell the world of His amazing love, and not let our past cripple us from being a true witness for Christ.
As for a recommendation about this movie, if it wasn’t obvious from my review. No.
Violence: Moderate to heavy / Profanity: Minor—“d*mn,” OMG / Sex/Nudity: Mild
See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.
PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.