Reviewed by: Alexander Malsan
CONTRIBUTOR
Moral Rating: | Offensive |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | • Adults |
Genre: | Psychological Thriller Mystery |
Length: | 1 hr. 42 min. |
Year of Release: | 2018 |
USA Release: |
January 21, 2018 (festival) August 3, 2018 (limited) August 31, 2018 (wide—1,207 theaters) September 7, 2018 (2,009 theaters) DVD: November 27, 2018 |
Missing child
Trying to find missing people
On-line activities of teens
Where did CANCER come from? Answer
How did bad things come about? Answer
Why does God allow innocent people to suffer? Answer
What about the issue of suffering? Doesn’t this prove that there is no God and that we are on our own? Answer
Does God feel our pain? Answer
What kind of world would you create? Answer
Featuring |
John Cho … David Kim Michelle La … Margot—daughter of David and Pamela Kim Debra Messing … Detective Rosemary Vick Steven Michael Eich … Robert—Detective Vick’s son Joseph Lee … Peter Kim—David’s brother Sara Sohn … Pamela Nam Kim—David’s wife and Margot’s mother Roy Abramsohn … Male Anchor Brad Abrell … News Reporter (voice) Gabriel D. Angell … Officer Brandon Jackson Thomas Barbusca … Cody Gage Biltoft … John Watson Kyle Austin Brown … K-9 unit See all » |
Director |
Aneesh Chaganty |
Producer |
Bazelevs Entertainment Bazelevs Production [Russia] See all » |
Distributor |
Screen Gems, a division of Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group, owned by Sony Pictures Entertainment |
“What is she hiding?”
David is just your average single father trying to make it work with his daughter, Margot. It really hasn’t been easy for him or for his daughter since the death of his wife, Pamela. I guess you could say he’s tried to keep himself busy with work and with his brother, Peter, to deal with having lost his wife and the effect it has had on him and Margot.
When it comes to Margot, David tries his best to salvage whatever remains of his relationship with her since her mother’s passing. Sure, they have their television nights together, but as time as passed Margot has become more and more distant. How well does David really know his daughter?
When Margot doesn’t return home from a study group (library?) one night, an alarm goes off in David’s head. Something’s not right. He notices Margot left her textbooks and laptop on the kitchen counter. Why would she do that if she was going to a study group?
David calls her cellphone. No response. He calls again. No response. After several attempts and multiple texts, he really worries. He contacts her classmates, “friends,” anyone he THOUGHT would know her and her whereabouts. Nothing. Most of those “friends” claim Margot is a loner at school, avoiding most social settings and that they would interact with her simply out of sympathy. Well, that was no help.
Eventually, David decides he needs to get the police involved. Detective Rosemary Vick, who volunteers for the case, tells him she has determined Margot has run off and, as evidence begins to show, was living a double life. Again, the question remains… how well did David THINK he knew his daughter?
When you see previews for “Searching,” the first thing that probably comes to your mind is, “Oh no, not another version of ‘Unfriended’! Haven’t we been there, done that?” Format-wise, yes, there are some similarities between the camera styles of “Searching” and “Unfriended.” However, comparing “Searching” and “Unfriended” is unwise, as it would be like comparing smartphones at a store. Sure, some of them share some elements, but when it comes right down to it they are their own phones. “Searching” and “Unfriended” are both thrillers, but one leans more toward horror (“Unfriended”) and one leans more toward suspense and panic (“Searching”). When it comes right down to it, though, what you have to look at, with both films, are these essential elements (which stand for, pretty much, all films): plot, pacing, character development and performance. So here’s the breakdown:
The Plot: Simple, yet effective. It doesn’t overcomplicate, nor does it insult the viewer’s intelligence. Rather, the plot allows, as others have mentioned, the viewer the chance to test theories, examine individuals, and ensure that no detail goes unturned. The plot’s twists are genuine, forthcoming, and truly unexpected, making even the most seasoned thriller fan question his movie-viewing skills.
The Pacing: Even. I didn’t find myself checking the time or thinking to myself, “When will this scene just end?” In some instances, I could have argued for some scenes to be a lengthened a little bit.
Character Development: Strong in every aspect. The character development is just strong enough in both David Kim and Margot to carry the film (again, not over-complicated to the point where we have to remember every detail of their lives, nor under-detailed where we question what drove them to certain decisions or conversations). I commend the writers for providing the balance that is necessary to sustain such a thriller.
The Performances: Jaw dropping and emotional. While John Cho may not be the most recognized actor in Hollywood, he very well should be. He provides such a level of emotion to his character—from concerned, to anxious, to self-anger, to self-guilt and makes us actually ponder questions such as, “How much has social media divided as it has brought together?” and “Has human, face-to-face interaction become such a lost art that we don’t even connect with our loved ones anymore?” Debra Messing also puts in a somewhat reserved, yet balanced performance.
Violence: There is a scene where David is witness-threatening a man and begins to choke him. There is also another another scene in which David threatens a young boy and breaks his jaw (we hear about it). David is also seen punching a hole in the wall a few times. A woman is seen bleeding. Someone mentions and eventually does commit suicide.
Language/Profanity: The f-word is spoken once and typed twice. God’s name is used in vain 5 times. Other profanities include h*ll and d*mn.
Sexual Content/Nudity: Moderately Heavy. A text message implies that someone had sexual relations with a family member. There’s a conversation about how babies are born. Someone mentions “boobies.” An eggplant is displayed during a converation (implying male genitalia). Someone mentions a woman “loves the d.” Some women wear revealing outfits.
One of the underlying themes that surrounds “Searching,” is the concept of careful parenting and taking time to really know one’s son or daughter. In this day and age, it is easy to become so preoccupied and our attention so divided between the world, our work, our commitments, etc., that we may easily end up losing track of those who matter to us. This includes the enormous amounts of time we spend on social media as well (yes, this is the world!). Here is the Bible’s take on the world:
“What good is it for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul?” —Mark 8:38
“The world and its desires pass away, but whoever does the will of God lives forever.” —1 John 2:17
“For everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith.” —1 John 5:4
The Scriptures are very clear about the role of a father (as well as a mother) and the value God places on family.
“Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord.” —Ephesians 6:4
“Children are a heritage from the LORD, offspring a reward from him.
Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are children born in one’s youth.
Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with their opponents in court.” —Psalm 127: 3-5
If I had to sum up my review in four words it would be this: “first appearances are deceiving.” I say this because at first glance you would think, “Eh, ‘Searching’ is just a copycat of other films that have come before it.” Do not be deceived though. It is a strong, emotional and powerfully told story, delivered in a mile-a-minute, hold-your-breath-during-the-final-act sort of fashion, with strong cinematic elements throughout. While there is some moderate use of profanity, violence and sexual dialog/content to contend with, I am glad I watched this movie. I hope to see more films from this director in the future.
PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.
Because of the heavy focus on computer technology, I did notice a much younger viewer audience. An older viewer may not be able to identify as much with the heavy emphasis on emailing, texting, Skyping and social media. It depends on how much in tune you are with it. It delivered for me and kept my interest to the very end.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5