Reviewed by: Marcus Mann
STAFF WRITER
Moral Rating: | Average—with caution |
Moviemaking Quality: |
|
Primary Audience: | • Adults • Young-Adults • Teens |
Genre: | Animation |
Length: | |
Year of Release: | 1996 |
USA Release: |
Featuring | voices of Tom Hulce, Demi Moore, Kevin Kline, Paul Kandel, Tony Jay, Charles Kimbrough, Jason Alexander, Mary Wickes, David Ogden Stiers |
Director |
Kirk Wise Gary Trousdale |
Producer | |
Distributor |
Disney’s animators have done it again. A genuine blockbuster! Spectacular animation, great music and charming characters highlight this adaptation of Victor Hugo’s classic tale.
Quasimodo (the “hunchback”) is a lonely outsider who dreams of leaving the protection of Notre Dame for just one day. He ventures into the city (Paris) during the annual Festival of Fools against the wishes of his master, the self-righteous, evil Judge Frollo. “Topsy-turvy”, the song for the celebration, describes very well the rest of the story as Quasimodo’s world turns upside down. During the celebration, he is crowned “King of the Fools” and finds himself falling instantly in love with the Gypsy dancer Esmeralda. Joy turns quickly to sorrow as the crowd cruelly mocks and rejects him for his misshapen appearance, failing to see the charm which lies below his odd looks.
Back in the safety of the Cathedral, Quasimodo is at first heartbroken to find that Esmeralda is in love with another, yet he ultimately risks everything to bring the two lovers together. In the end, the entire city of Paris owes Quasimodo a great debt as he teaches the people the important lesson of acceptance and love. Paris learns to appreciate the unique values of the outcast Gypsies and the disfigured hunchback.
As Christians, we find this to be an admirable lesson. The Bible teaches that all the people in the world are the miraculous creation of God (in God’s own image) no matter the color of skin or the standard of beauty. Gratefully, Disney’s adaptation of the novel makes the great Cathedral, and it’s priest, the protector and sanctuary of the mistreated; rather than an evil oppressor. Disney erects a clearly evil judge as the villain, making it easy for the entire audience to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys.
The major weakness of this film lies in it’s portrayal of evil judge Follo’s lust for Esmeralda. The scenes which deal with this topic are intense, dark and definitely adult in nature. If indeed this film were intended for younger children (as the toy marketing would indicate), then Disney has sadly missed the mark.
“The Hunchback of Notre Dame” is easily the best Disney animation since “Beauty and Beast.” Older children, teenagers and adults will thrill to the adventures of this likable bell-ringer, but parents may want to preview it before taking their younger kids.
Twice in the movie, the dialogue makes an oblique reference to the all-knowing eyes who will bring judgment on evil-doers. A glance toward heaven lets us think for a moment that the reference is toward God. However, both times, the view immediately pans to the gargoyles. Indeed, at the end of the movie, judgment comes not from God but the stone characters come to life.
Though the portrayal of a priest is warm, in this movie with many religious themes, the message is quite blatant that God is irrelevant to the discussion. The animation is excellent, but Disney does a disservice by marketing the movie to children. This movie has a dark, haunting atmosphere, certainly unsuitable for children due to the sexual content and misguided religious references.