Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures
Today’s Prayer Focus
MOVIE REVIEW

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

also known as “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse - Part One,” “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (partie 1),” “Homem-Aranha: Através do Aranhaverso,” “Người Nhện: Du Hành Vũ Trụ Nhện,” See more »
MPA Rating: PG-Rating (MPA) for sequences of animated action violence, some language and thematic elements.

Reviewed by: Blake Wilson
CONTRIBUTOR

Moral Rating: Average
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Preteens Family Teens Young-Adults Adults
Genre: Animation Superhero Sci-Fi Action Adventure Comedy Fantasy IMAX
Length: 2 hr. 20 min.
Year of Release: 2023
USA Release: June 2, 2023 (wide release)
DVD: September 5, 2023
Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Picturesclick photos to ENLARGE Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures
Relevant Issues

Teen Qs™—Christian Answers for teenagers
Teens! Have questions? Find answers in our popular TeenQs section. Get answers to your questions about life, dating and much more.

Self-sacrifice

What is LYING? What are the truly BIG lies of our world?

What is TRUTH? Answer

Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures Copyright, Columbia Pictures, a division of Sony Pictures
Featuring Shameik MooreMiles Morales (voice)
Hailee SteinfeldGwen Stacy (voice)
Oscar IsaacMiguel O’Hara (voice)
Jake JohnsonPeter B. Parker (voice)
Issa RaeJessica Drew (voice)
Brian Tyree HenryJefferson Davis (voice)
Andy SambergBen Reilly / Scarlet Spide (voice)
Jason SchwartzmanJonathan Ohnn / The Spot (voice)
Daniel KaluuyaHobart ‘Hobie’ Brown / Spider-Punk (voice)
See all »
Director Joaquim Dos Santos
Kemp Powers
Justin K. Thompson
Producer Sony Pictures Animation
Marvel Entertainmen
See all »
Distributor
Distributor: Columbia Pictures. Trademark logo.
Columbia Pictures
, a division of Sony Pictures

Prequel: “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” (2018)

Review updated July 2, 2023

It’s been a couple of years since Miles Morales (Shameik Moore) was bitten by a radioactive spider and became the new Spider-Man in his universe. What’s happened since then? Puberty, high school, and also keeping his identity as Spider-Man a secret…even from his parents. And, now, there’s a new supervillain terrorizing the streets of New York. A faceless humanoid named “The Spot” (Jason Schwartzman), who apparently has a grudge against Spider-Man and yearns to be his nemesis.

Meanwhile, Gwen Stacy (Hailee Steinfeld) is having troubles of her own in her universe. Not only is she blamed for the death of someone close to her, she is strained in her relationships with others. One day, Gwen’s universe is invaded by a villain from a distant universe. In the middle of the battle, her universe is invaded again…this time by a couple of other Spider-people. Miguel O’Hara (Oscar Isaac) and Jessica Drew (Issa Rae), who come to take care of the anomaly. In response to all of this, Gwen goes back with Miguel and Jessica to join the Spider Society.

One day, Gwen makes her way back to Miles’ universe to investigate The Spot’s multiversal mischief, as well as possibly invite Miles to the Spider Society. Would that be a good idea? Or could it potentially lead to disaster?

Entertainment Value

“Across the Spider-Verse” is an impressive film in many respects. The main thing here is, of course, the stunning animation. Each universe depicted here is given its own art style and distinct touch—as does each Spider-Man. Meanwhile, the 2D/3D mix has improved some from the more “experimental” usage in the first one. There are a handful of visually-striking touches I will not spoil here.

The characters are given stronger development here, too. Miles and Gwen are given equally-compelling character stories, and the family dynamics are terrifically-written. The new characters are likable as well. My personal favorite would probably have to be Spider-Punk, a British rocker version of Spider-Man voiced well by Daniel Kaluuya. While I didn’t understand some of what he said, he exuded personality and his Spider-Man had the most unique and fascinating design.

For such an involved story with so much going on, I have to hand it to the writing team. They did a great job keeping the focus on the characters, and don’t quite make it feel overstuffed. Yes, there’s a lot of Spider characters here. However, they manage to give enough time for each new character to shine (a lot of the minor ones are used as pure comic relief). A handful of surprises are well-executed and unpredictable as well. There’s also not too many villains either. The film’s primary villain is an escalating threat that may be just getting started.

On the downside, like the last film, “Across the Spider-Verse” does get a little carried away with its hip-hop/electro pop music in the score. I would have liked to have seen a little more traditional music from returning composer Daniel Pemberton. Also, the film’s 20-minute prologue centered around Gwen didn’t need to be as long as it is. It could have been shortened or switched back and forth between her’s and Miles’ story. That being said, Gwen is given a strong character arc here. Finally, while I loved seeing Peter B. Parker (Jake Johnson) again, I felt like he was shortchanged a bit in terms of screentime. And, Peni Parker, Spider-Man Noir and Spider-Ham (great characters from the first film) are nearly completely absent here—but, that being said, there’s a hint they may return.

Positive Messages

There’s a strong positive theme about the importance of positive, sacrificial and loving parents. Gwen and her Dad and Miles and his parents all struggle with trying to meet each other halfway. And it’s made abundantly clear that all of them have room to grow and things they can learn from each other. (There is a spoiler alert in the next paragraph.)

Gwen’s Dad (Captain George Stacy) does find out about her secret identity. Later on in the film, it is revealed that Gwen’s dad quit the police force as a choice to help protect his daughter. I thought this was a moving example of a father’s sacrificial love.

Meanwhile, Miles’ parents struggle with how to best handle their son’s budding independence. Not long after an intense conflict, Miles’ mom (Rio) attempts to meet her son halfway and does her best to try and understand what her son is going through (although he falls short of telling her who he is). Of course, with Miles hiding his secret, his parents absolutely and appropriately hold him accountable and guide him.

The film sends home the message that relationships (especially familial, though can absolutely be applied in romantic relationships and friendships as well) can be challenging and difficult at times. It takes grace, sacrifice, selflessness, perseverance, and unconditional love to make it work and grow. In our relationships, we can model sacrificial love in the way Christ did. Paul summarizes this thought in 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 ESV.

Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends.”

Negative Content

SEXUAL CONTENT: Very tame. A couple of characters are shown wearing tank tops or something that might reveal cleavage. Gwen accidentally leaves her sweater in Miles’ room, which gives his parents the false impression that something else could be going on. Another misunderstanding involves talking about Spider-Punk and implied feelings between him and Gwen, which is also proven untrue.

LANGUAGE: There’s a little more foul language here than in the first film. We hear two uses each of “a**” and “h***”, one “d***”, and two misuses of God’s name. There’s also a couple of uses of “cr*p”, and several uses of the word “shoot” in one scene, including a couple with loud music in the background that may give the impression they said the s-word instead.

DRUGS/ALCOHOL: Wine is seen at a party. Gwen is mistakenly suspected to have a Dad that “deals drugs”.

VIOLENCE: This is definitely the main concern here. Several scenes of peril and action violence involving villains using multiple weapons to smash, hit, and pummel Spider-Man. The Spot causes a lot of mayhem with a collider and causes buildings to crumble as well. An earthquake nearly causes the death of one character. A vision prophesies the death of another. In worst case scenarios, entire universes of characters are seen pixelating out of existence. One action scene features an intense brawl with loud sound effects between two Spider-Men. One is shown to have a vampire-like appearance with claws and fangs (in shadow form). Characters are held at gunpoint. Glass windows and various debris collapse. Spiders bite people. The death of Uncle Ben is seen replicated in many universes. That being said, this is all handled with pretty much no bloodshed.

SPIRITUALITY: None. However, there are discussions about fate and how breaking it can cause tragic consequences.

OTHER: Lying and deceit play a big part in any superhero story, especially in these Spider-Man stories involving teenagers telling lies. Miles and Gwen lie repeatedly, though for mostly heroic reasons and to protect their loved ones. Meanwhile, one scene involves a couple of dirty diaper jokes courtesy of Peter B. Parker and his toddler-aged daughter.

Conclusion

“Into the Spider-Verse” was a groundbreaking animated film in many respects. Not only did it experiment with bringing different animation styles together, but it genuinely revolutionized animated filmmaking (along with the tired, yet reliable superhero genre). It was well-received and went on to win the Best Animated Feature Oscar. You have to wonder, how can you top that?

From here, like the storytelling team behind the first film decided to take a page from the Marvel Cinematic Universe and try to top it with not one, but TWO animated films (Part 2, “Beyond the Spider-Verse,’ is scheduled for next March). For those who have followed along with the film’s progress, no, this is not a spoiler. (That being said, I will add that my friend who came with me didn’t know this, and the look on his face and reaction was absolutely priceless.)

Based on the effort here, I think I can say “Across the Spider-Verse” may have topped the original. The animation is absolutely spectacular. The character dynamics are deeper and more involved. The action sequences are stunning. And the story developments and surprises are unexpected and pulled off in unexpectedly genius fashion.

For Christian families looking for something to see, “Across the Spider-Verse” stays within PG boundaries overall, though I will say it is too intense and mature for very young viewers (I would say ages 7 and under). There is some unnecessary mild language and some lying/deceit. However, on the very positive side of things, I did not sense any agenda-driven or obvious political messaging here, no real inappropriate sexual content or humor, and no dark spirituality here to report either (all superpowers are the result of science experiments gone awry). I would say if you’re not sure if your child can handle the content, I would say “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” is a safer choice for more sensitive youngsters.

For older superhero fans and movie fans, however, “Across the Spider-Verse” is stellar entertainment. Pure escapism at just about its finest.

POSTSCRIPT: A couple of weeks after seeing “Across the Spider-Verse,’ the following was brought to my attention… in one scene, a small blue and pink poster is briefly shown in the background of Gwen Stacy’s room saying, “Protect Trans Kids’. In another scene, a badge with the colors of the pride flag is briefly shown on Gwen’s dad’s police uniform. These details will very likely be missed by most viewers (as was the case with me). That being said, in contrast to what was originally stated in my conclusion, it does seem that the filmmakers were trying to make a (very subtle) statement in agreement with a leftist, woke agenda.

  • Violence: Moderate
  • Profane language: Mild
  • Vulgar/Crude language: Mild
  • Wokeism: Mild
  • Drugs/Alcohol: Minor
  • Nudity: None
  • Sex: None
  • Occult: None

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.


Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Positive—I went to see this movie with my 13 year old daughter and 15 year old son (my wife is not a fan of animated films, sadly). They loved it, and so did I. My daughter got very emotional at several points, and told me after the film that Gwen’s fear of rejection by her father made her grateful I would never reject her, and Miles’ fear for his father’s life when it’s threatened made her think about how she would feel if I were in danger.

This film values family—even Jessica Drew, who was unmarried in the comics, is now happily married, and anti-villain Miguel O'Hara’s motivation is deeply tied to his family.

There is a villain (anti-villain, possibly; he gets very little screen time) at the very end of the film who has gone down the path he has due to losing his father, highlighting the importance of having both parents in your life as God intended.

[Spoilers begin here!] My son enjoyed that Miles, like a good Christian, understands the value of every single life, and isn’t willing to accept that some have to die. Miles wants to save every life possible, which is morally correct, as God knew us all before we were born and has plans for our lives.See all »
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Rus, age 52 (USA)
Neutral
Neutral—To put it simply, this film is about a group of super powered beings that try to cope with their circumstances after being introduced by trials that have all been set by satan in some way. The main purpose of the film is to see how the characters will be able to overcome these trials and see the purposes behind their situations. As a Christian, the main problem lies with whether or not the characters will be able to overcome their challenges and trials in a Christian manner or by relying on any doctrine that resembles the Christian walk to cope with satan’s schemes and tactics.

Sadly, in this film, I don’t see that happening and I doubt that it will happen in the 3rd film. The reason I think so is because of the fact that Gwen’s family in the film is depicted to be Christian in some way (praying before eating), yet the exact cause for strife in the family is not fully explained in the film and leaves things for the audience to interpret on their own as to why Gwen’s relationship with her father is the way it is in the film. This might lead some to believe that the Christian religion is the cause for the strife to begin with.

There is no profanity or adverse use of violence yet there is a clear disconnect between Chirstian morality and societal norms of the modern age and in cinema as if they were trying to target a certain demographic with this story that would most likely be involved with a chruch in some way and would be under the age of 18 or 20 which is emphasized by the visual arts take of this film that expands on the first installment. However, the same can be said for those who would be drawn in by the artistic expression yet have a societal view of the Christian religion and don’t know about God, possibly solidifying their own beliefs about the world around them and how the lack of “Christianity” fits in with that.

Also, the Spider Society try and push Miles to where he ends up by the end of the film. And to add to the depth of that, the number 42 is constantly displayed throughout this film and the 1st as if there is some connection between the Israelites’ time in the desert to become better suited as God’s people and Miles’s Spider-man journey (there sadly is not by stealing from God to give to Satan).
My Ratings: Moral rating: Average / Moviemaking quality: 3
Abraham Oloyede, age 28 (USA)
Negative
Negative—I saw the first film, which my son wanted to see but I was not impressed and the different styles of animation was jarring and offputting. Onto this new film and it is incredibly noisy, the heavy metal/grunge music and sound effects drowned out pretty much all the dialogue and I couldn’t understand what the characters were saying, most of the time!

The different styles of animation within even individual frames was again offputting and didn’t really help, it was just annoying to me.

What was good, is that one sees a brief still of a family holding hands round the dining table, heads bowed, saying grace and a pregnant spider woman on a motorcycle mentions her husband and not wanting to know if the baby is a boy and girl until it’s born. So all as it should be there and no Dad’s boyfriend/husband, mother’s girlfriend/wife unGodly stuff, as is happening over at Disney.

The long running time was ludicrous and could have easily been up to an hour shorter and got through the same story—yet the film *SLIGHT SPOILER ALERT* ends on a cliffhanger, to be continued! There was too much exposition, especially for this type of film. Plus personally, having a load of spiderverses and thousands of spider people all in some big organisation is very silly and worthless. This coming from someone who used to collect comic books, especially Spider-Man.

So nothing really dodgy for Christians, except for one (in silhouette) scene where we see a spider vampire man and they mention vampire in the dialogue.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: ½
Dirk Wickenden, age 55 (United Kingdom)
Comments from young people
Positive—My question and sort of concern to bring up was one part which stood out to me in the movie. It was the scene right before Miles was sent back to where he thought was “home”. As the scene begins, the girl who is the computer and tech savvy girl in the spider society is seen on some sort of device swiping left on some sort of app with women on the pictures. I could not figure out if these women were to be her friends or were to be looked at objectively, but it did stand out to me. It was only maybe 30 seconds, but the girl was saying “no” and swiping left.

Would this be looked at as an agenda to normalize homosexuality? I’m genuinely curious because that is what it seemed like to me.

Also, just to clarify, I only have this concern because I believe that God created man and woman to be in a romantic relationship specifically within the context of marriage. I do not ask and bring up my concerns because of hate or anything like that.

Our purpose on Earth is to know God, Glorify Him, and enjoy him forever and we must die to our flesh to do so. In the Bible Jesus says that whoever loses their life for His sake will find it. The message is to repent and believe in the gospel, not to keep sinking and being outside of His Will. I hope this makes sense. Thank you!
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 4½
Yvana, age 18 (USA)
Response from a reader
Positive—I am writing this as a reply to a comment by Yvana. The tech savvy computer girl is an avatar. Her real physical body is still in her home dimension and she is using the hologram to interact with the spider-society. The “other women” you saw her looking at were pictures of herself with different hairstyles. You’ll notice that every time she swipes to the next picture, the hair on her avatar changes as well. What you mistook for her looking at other women on some sort of dating site, was actually just her trying out different hairstyles for her avatar.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Better than Average / Moviemaking quality: 5
Henry, age 38 (USA)

PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.